Comments on: California Taxpayers Paid To Train Kink.com Porn Staff

By: Hotel Honeys Escorts London

Hotel Honeys Escorts London — Sat, 22 Oct 2011 13:13:00 +0000

I'm sure the good people of California appriate the addion to state GDP driven by the porn industry. All those lovely tax dollers funding education, health etc. God know how much in tax we have paid at London Escorts but such is life

By: public records

public records — Thu, 06 May 2010 17:18:50 +0000

hi friend i am happy for reading this and like this!

By: tiberiu84

tiberiu84 — Wed, 23 Sep 2009 07:05:43 +0000

Sexuality could be easily taught in school and for less money: have you ever heard of female escorts? That would useful and very very explicit. Right?

By: Rich Chuckrey

Rich Chuckrey — Wed, 29 Apr 2009 17:01:35 +0000

Say the porn industry is in fact generating a lot of revenue for California. Then Kink[dot]com should have the $50K for training and have avoided decoying themselves as an entertainment company, applying for government funding and bilking California of money that [we both know] could have been better spent.

Poor judgment on Kink's part.

By: Rich Chuckrey

Rich Chuckrey — Wed, 29 Apr 2009 17:01:05 +0000

Not sure I understand your definition of 'taxpayer.' Companies and individuals alike are taxpayers. Are you implying Kink[dot]com should have the same priority and access to tax revenue as say, the state's engineering, agriculture, criminal justice, or social work industries. Paying taxes doesn't make Kink porn alright. California's Employment Training Panel made a good policy decision in saying the adult entertainment industry is 'lowest' priority funding. Like I said, the money is better spent elsewhere.

By: Webmistress

Webmistress — Wed, 29 Apr 2009 16:27:30 +0000

Um... it's NOT taxpayer's money. It comes from employer tax funds - funded by companies, including Kink.com, not you and me... This has also been repeated ad nauseum, but that doesn't seem to make a difference.

By: Rich Chuckrey

Rich Chuckrey — Tue, 28 Apr 2009 17:57:22 +0000

Say the porn industry is in fact generating a lot of revenue for California. Then Kink.com should have the $50K for training and have avoided decoying themselves as an entertainment company, applying for government funding and bilking California of money that [we both know] could have been better spent.

Poor judgment on Kink's part.

By: Lady 'Lin

Lady 'Lin — Mon, 27 Apr 2009 18:03:56 +0000

Editing skills are editing skills – I'm not sure why it's a big deal *what* they're editing. The porn industry brings a lot of revenue into California – Chatsworth is the porn capital of the world, or so I've been told.

However, if there are set-in-stone limitations that were overlooked when the money/training was given to them, they should definitely have to pay it back.