<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Microsoft Drops 3-App Limit, Publishes Strict Windows 7 Netbook Limits</title>
	<atom:link href="http://techmiso.com/2074/microsoft-drops-3-app-limit-publishes-strict-windows-7-netbook-limits/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://techmiso.com/2074/microsoft-drops-3-app-limit-publishes-strict-windows-7-netbook-limits/</link>
	<description>Tech evangelism and Miso soup like no other</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 18:03:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: protomanatee</title>
		<link>http://techmiso.com/2074/microsoft-drops-3-app-limit-publishes-strict-windows-7-netbook-limits/comment-page-1/#comment-1026</link>
		<dc:creator>protomanatee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2009 12:11:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techmiso.com/?p=2074#comment-1026</guid>
		<description>You are correct, and the usage bugs me as well... but I think it is pretty much a lost cause.  Up there with &quot;I couldn&#039;t care less&quot; versus &quot;I could care less&quot;....    What we need is a script that checks media, blogs, etc. for the phrase, and then autocomments, auto-letter-writes-to-editor, etc..   Scanning would be easy enough, but the robo-posting would be tricky.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are correct, and the usage bugs me as well&#8230; but I think it is pretty much a lost cause.  Up there with &#8220;I couldn&#39;t care less&#8221; versus &#8220;I could care less&#8221;&#8230;.    What we need is a script that checks media, blogs, etc. for the phrase, and then autocomments, auto-letter-writes-to-editor, etc..   Scanning would be easy enough, but the robo-posting would be tricky.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cacarr</title>
		<link>http://techmiso.com/2074/microsoft-drops-3-app-limit-publishes-strict-windows-7-netbook-limits/comment-page-1/#comment-1021</link>
		<dc:creator>cacarr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 17:01:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techmiso.com/?p=2074#comment-1021</guid>
		<description>&quot;This then begs the question - will Windows 7 Home be capable of running on these machines with no noticeable performance degradation?&quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;To &quot;beg the question&quot; is to commit a particular variety of logical fallacy. It&#039;s an expression from logic. You mean, &quot;This raises the question...&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;This then begs the question &#8211; will Windows 7 Home be capable of running on these machines with no noticeable performance degradation?&#8221;</p>
<p>To &#8220;beg the question&#8221; is to commit a particular variety of logical fallacy. It&#39;s an expression from logic. You mean, &#8220;This raises the question&#8230;&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Jarkoff</title>
		<link>http://techmiso.com/2074/microsoft-drops-3-app-limit-publishes-strict-windows-7-netbook-limits/comment-page-1/#comment-1020</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Jarkoff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 16:41:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techmiso.com/?p=2074#comment-1020</guid>
		<description>No beef at all with Thurrott. Throughout the years he has defended&lt;br&gt;Microsoft even when it was obvious they did not need defending. So it&lt;br&gt;was for that reason why I called him an apologist - it&#039;s an apt label&lt;br&gt;as far as I&#039;m concerned.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Completely agree with your point on MS being afraid of a cheap version&lt;br&gt;of Windows. Makes sense - it is exactly why they should focus on&lt;br&gt;producing a single version of the OS rather than multiple versions&lt;br&gt;with inane features.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No beef at all with Thurrott. Throughout the years he has defended<br />Microsoft even when it was obvious they did not need defending. So it<br />was for that reason why I called him an apologist &#8211; it&#39;s an apt label<br />as far as I&#39;m concerned.</p>
<p>Completely agree with your point on MS being afraid of a cheap version<br />of Windows. Makes sense &#8211; it is exactly why they should focus on<br />producing a single version of the OS rather than multiple versions<br />with inane features.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MonTemplar</title>
		<link>http://techmiso.com/2074/microsoft-drops-3-app-limit-publishes-strict-windows-7-netbook-limits/comment-page-1/#comment-1016</link>
		<dc:creator>MonTemplar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 03:43:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techmiso.com/?p=2074#comment-1016</guid>
		<description>Microsoft is deathly afraid of letting a cheap version of Windows become widely available to the buying public, plain and simple. Hence the multiple versions of Vista and Windows 7, and the restrictions they place on what you can do with each version. (Actually, that last part is not new... they were doing the same things to Windows 2000 Professional and Windows XP Home, to stop you using them for server work).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;As an aside, what&#039;s you beef with Paul Thurrott?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Microsoft is deathly afraid of letting a cheap version of Windows become widely available to the buying public, plain and simple. Hence the multiple versions of Vista and Windows 7, and the restrictions they place on what you can do with each version. (Actually, that last part is not new&#8230; they were doing the same things to Windows 2000 Professional and Windows XP Home, to stop you using them for server work).</p>
<p>As an aside, what&#39;s you beef with Paul Thurrott?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: YorickPeterse</title>
		<link>http://techmiso.com/2074/microsoft-drops-3-app-limit-publishes-strict-windows-7-netbook-limits/comment-page-1/#comment-1015</link>
		<dc:creator>YorickPeterse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 03:33:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techmiso.com/?p=2074#comment-1015</guid>
		<description>I just don&#039;t get Microsoft at all, it seems they haven&#039;t learned anything. It starts to look like Microsoft is getting afraid of other companies, such as Apple, taking over their market share.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just don&#39;t get Microsoft at all, it seems they haven&#39;t learned anything. It starts to look like Microsoft is getting afraid of other companies, such as Apple, taking over their market share.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

