Obama’s New Blackberry? Ugly Gets The Job Done!

DiplomatThere’s a lot of talk lately about Obama’s Blackberry and what choices he will have once he enters his presidency. What initially shocked me was the lack of understanding by the general public when it comes to secure devices.

Engadget shed some light on the only two devices NSA has approved for use by government and DoD personnel.

The NSA approval process is not an easy thing to get through.  Both the General Dynamics’ Sectera Edge and L-3 Communications’ Guardian are NSA Type 1 approved smartphones.

For the uninitiated, Wikipedia defines Type 1 encryption as the following:

In cryptography, a Type 1 product is a device or system certified by the National Security Agency (NSA) for use in cryptographically securing classified U.S. Government information.

Type 1 certification is a rigorous process that includes testing and formal analysis of (among other things) cryptographic security, functional security, tamper resistance, emissions security (EMSEC/TEMPEST), and security of the product manufacturing and distribution process.

What everyone doesn’t seem to understand is these are both pretty slick devices. They can handle wireless communications up to Top Secret and email up to Secret. Anyone who has been in the military knows that crypto hardware tends to be massive and made to take a pounding.

To fit Type 1 encryption into a package this small is pretty amazing. I have played with a demo unit of the Sectera Edge and was pretty impressed. It has two separate banks of memory, two separate USB inputs, and can change between secure/unsecure in a single button push.  It can connect to GSM, CDMA, and WiFi networks (both unsecure/secure networks). Let’s see your phone from Sprint do that.

Ok, so it does run WinMO, but I am sure there is some GD engineer with a test unit running OSX or Android! Did I mention you drop this thing in a puddle, use it while skydiving, and use it the desert without any issues?

So before you knock these type of devices as the ugly ducklings of the smartphone world, imagine how many add-ons it would take to get your iPhone or Blackberry up to the same level of functionality.  These may be ugly but they were not made for the “my phone is so kawaii, check out the faux blinged-out heart i just bedazzled on hot pink Disney themed phone” type of crowd.

View Comments on “Obama’s New Blackberry? Ugly Gets The Job Done!”

Comments

1 Rich Chuckrey Jan 15th, 2009, at 04:02

My bet is Barack will sacrifice sexy for functionality. Same keyboard, right?

2 Rich Chuckrey Jan 15th, 2009, at 02:08

My best is Barack will sacrafice sexy for functionality. Same keyboard, right?

3 Scott Jarkoff Jan 15th, 2009, at 15:05

The only problem I've seen with WinMO is its horrible battery consumption – it's far worse than an iPhone!

Another thing – even though these devices are ugly and bulky, and as you said – they get the job done – i find it hard to believe Obama will either care of be carrying his device. His aides will be shuttling the handheld around for him.

Ultimately, who cares what the idiots at Engadget and /. think, right?

4 Simon Jan 20th, 2009, at 19:31

I lost all respect for the writing of Engadeget as soon as they began posting childish knocks against products. The line "In russia smart phone carry you" kind of finnished off any latent respect I may have held for them, it just makes them sound like 15 year olds.

5 Scott Jarkoff Jan 20th, 2009, at 20:32

Engadget does write a little too snarky for my taste too. But they usually do cover some things not seen elsewhere.

Personally, I like Boing Boing Gadgets better.

Write a comment

(required)

(required, but not published)

(optional)

You may use only these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

blog comments powered by Disqus