Teens Using Digital Drugs to Get High on the Internet

In what has got to be one of the wackiest technology related stories I have read in quite some time, Wired’s Threat Level is reporting that kids across the United States are getting high on the internet thanks to so-called ecstasy-inducing MP3 files:

Kids around the country are getting high on the internet, thanks to MP3s that induce a state of ecstasy. And it could be a gateway drug leading teens to real-world narcotics.

At least, that’s what Oklahoma News 9 is reporting about a phenomenon called “i-dosing,” which involves finding an online dealer who can hook you up with “digital drugs” that get you high through your headphones.

Oddly enough, an Oklahoma school is taking this whack-ass threat seriously. They ended up sending out letters to parents to warn of this supposed new “drug” making its rounds on the internets. A side effect of this is the school has now banned iPods on school grounds to hopefully prevent students from becoming “cyber-drug” fiends. Seriously.

For the life of me I can not believe this is serious. No matter how much these digital drug dealers try, I can not fathom how this would even work to create some crack-like state of ecstasy. This whole idea is ridiculous.

Now I’ve listened to some MP3 music which made me want throw my laptop out of a fourth story window because the music was absolutely horrifyingly bad. I’ve listened to other highly intense music which made me feel all tingly inside.

But never have I listened to an MP3 which made me high, as if I had just gotten baked off some of the good stuff. Never. Ever.

The article is worth a read, if for no other reason than the amusement factor. Maybe it was meant to be taken in stride, maybe it is completely serious. Whatever the case, it sounds like there are some morons out there “educating” our students about things that do not yet exist.

The lesson in all this: keep your kids away from the Oklahoma Mustang Public School district because they will surely not be receiving a quality education from idiotic teachers like those who believe one can get high off an MP3 file.

Jackasses at NTP Sue Google, Apple and Others for Email Patent Infringement

Those jackasses at patent holding company NTP once again have opted to use the courtroom to attempt to generate revenue rather than innovating in the technology space. This time they are suing Google, Apple, HTC, LG, Microsoft and Motorola for allegedly violating eight of their patents covering wireless email delivery.

In 2001, NTP filed a similar suit against Research In Motion, and in 2006, the suit was dismissed after RIM paid $612 million in a settlement. As a result of that arrangement, RIM is not named in the new suit, nor is Nokia — the world’s largest smartphone maker — since both companies have licensing agreements with the patent company.

I find the timing quite interesting. The NTP vs. RIM lawsuit concluded in 2006, yet it took NTP four additional years before deciding to sue these companies. Here in 2010 Apple and HTC own the smartphone market with their iPhone and Android products respectively. Could this suit have anything to do with the extreme popularity of those devices?

Surely there is a relationship otherwise, for example, why not sue Apple upon the release of the first iPhone since its email capabilities have virtually remained the same?

Either way, patent holding companies like NTP – companies which purchase patents rather than innovating themselves – which do not produce any types of products but opt to use the courts for profit only end up hurting the technology sector as a whole. As long as there are greedy bastards like NTP running around suing companies on baseless grounds then many corporations will be afraid to take risks for fear of being in the crosshairs of some pointless, faceless, product-less lawsuit machine.

Tynt, the Copy/Paste Jerks

John Gruber on the annoying use of Tynt on certain high-trafficked web sites:

All of this nonsense — the attribution appended to copied text, the inline search results popovers — is from a company named Tynt, which bills itself as “The copy/paste company”.

It’s a bunch of user-hostile SEO bullshit.

Everyone knows how copy and paste works. You select text. You copy. When you paste, what you get is exactly what you selected. The core product of the “copy/paste company” is a service that breaks copy and paste.

He goes on to offer a simple, easy-to-implement trick to disable Tynt on all web sites in one fell swoop. It took me a mere five seconds to do and works like a charm.

Any web site believing they can get away with bullshit tactics like this does not deserve to be visited. I am not certain what these sites believe they are getting out of using a service of this nature. Seems much more counterproductive than anything.

RSS is Not Dead Yet and Twitter is Not Our Savior

RSS vs. TwitterAs I was surfing through Google Reader in preparation of writing a post on a completely unrelated subject I happened across this craptastic piece of editorial bologna by Steve Gillmor at TechCrunchIT on the ostensible death of RSS. In his infinite wisdom Gillmor claims to have completely given up on his RSS reader in favor of Twitter. Whatever it is Steve is smoking it sure must be some good stuff because his barely coherent rant against RSS makes no sense at all.

Read the full story …

We Do Not Need A New Internet

The worlds networkThere has been a lot of talk over the last couple days since John Markoff published his New York Times article asking the world if a new Internet is necessary. I read the article in its entirety a number of times, both backwards, forwards and sideways, and can not for the life of me can not find any compelling reason for architecting a new internet. It seems, Markoff is either smoking crack or has no true understanding of the Internet.

Read the full story …

RIAA Goes To New Lengths To Demonstrate Their Hypocrisy, Appeals Order To Webcast Trial

RIAAIn one of the most brilliant moves to-date against the RIAA’s litigation campaign versus music consumers, the Tenenbaum legal team led by Harvard Law School Professor Charles Nesson has convinced the court to allow the trial to be broadcast live on the internet. In her opinion granting the request, Judge Gertner noted how peculiar it was for the RIAA to appeal, especially considering they have repeatedly stipulated the entire basis for the lawsuits was to educate consumers about the evils of music piracy.

Read the full story …

Page 1 of 11